Seppala Siberian Sleddog Feeding
(Prepared in consultation with Isa Boucher, M.Sc.)

 

FEEDING IS A CENTRAL ISSUE in the world of working sleddogs. There are many different ways to approach the job of ensuring that hard-working animals get nutritional input of sufficient quality to keep them working at their maximum potential without loss of muscle mass, health or condition. Inevitably one's feeding plan will be influenced by finances, availability of key ingredients, keeping qualities, weight and transport considerations, and a host of other factors beyond those dictated by nutritional theory. What is worse, there is significant disagreement about fundamentals of working dog nutrition. Much of the available information on that subject originates from sources that might be suspected of bias favouring their own commercial interests. So whose responsibility is it, anyway, to see to it that your hard-working sleddogs are nourished according to their needs? It's easy to leave things to the "experts" but is that really a safe option?

Taking Responsibility for Your Dogs' Nutrition

IF YOU OWN AND DRIVE SLEDDOGS, if they work hard pulling a sled for you in all kinds of difficult weather, you really have no easy option: you must take responsibility for your dogs' nutrition. They are unable to go out and get what they want and need for themselves, confined as they are in your kennel. (If they were to get out and take responsibility for their own nutrition, you would be up to your ears in lawsuits from sheep and poultry farmers!) You cannot abdicate responsibility for their nutritional needs. By that, we mean that you cannot leave it all to Mr. Purina or Mr. Iams, who are responsible only to their shareholders, not to you or your dogs. Believe it or not, it isn't as easy as just handing them a dish of dry kibble!
      Just how you go about taking responsibility for your sleddogs' nutrition is up to you. Everybody's circumstances are a little different. (If you happen to live in Australia, you may wind up feeding them kangaroo meat!) If you feed some kind of commercial ration, you will still have to provide additional meat, fat and vitamins. (No matter what the analysis on the bag says, some nutrients such as Vitamin E deteriorate significantly before the dog food reaches its consumer.) If finally, in desperation (as we did) you decide to provide your sleddogs with rations prepared in your own kennel, then you must do some independent research and observe your dogs constantly and accurately to get feedback on how your programme works.

Isa Boucher demonstrates the dedication necessary to feed Seppala Siberian Sleddogs correctly in any kind of weather conditions.
Isa Boucher prepares a warm meal for our Seppalas on a very cold winter day

      Ask older, experienced dog drivers who have been in the game for many years to tell you in detail how they feed sleddogs, and how they have observed other experienced drivers feed their dogs. You will find there is a lot of room for opinion on the fine points, but you will probably quickly discover the consensus is meat and fat, first and foremost, and plenty of them. Remember that in the end the decision about what to feed is yours alone, but your dogs must suffer the consequences of that decision. If you take the easy way out and let a multinational corporation do your thinking for you, your dogs could wind up with toxicosis, malnutrition, and allergies. We have seen mushers lose litters and have adult sleddogs drop dead in training or on their stakeouts, in a way that strongly suggested nutritional causes, while the owners merely grumbled about 'genetic defects.' Apparently it's easy to be unaware about canine nutrition, but to be aware is your responsibility.
   So let's start our examination of sleddog nutrition where most people do, with commercial dog foods.

Commercial Dog Foods

THESE COME IN FOUR COMMON FORMATS: canned wet dogfood, moist crumbled rations in plastic packets, dry kibbled or nugget dog food in paper sacks, and dry ground meal rations in paper or plastic sacks. Of these four only the latter two are really worthy of consideration for those who own more than a single pet animal, due to problems of expense, convenience and nutrition.

CANNED DOG FOOD is prepared to look and smell like meat, but in fact it is mostly cereal and moisture. Each can contains about 70 percent water, for which the buyer pays a high price in packaging, promotion, and transport costs. Most such foods are apt to be nutritionally deficient for working dogs. Anyone with a kennel can tell you that opening a stack of metal cans each evening rapidly becomes a big pain in the neck. Not a serious option for dog team owners!

MOIST CRUMBLED RATIONS in packets are subject to virtually the same drawbacks as canned foods. They can be yet more expensive, are seldom formulated for dogs with high energy requirements, and are inconvenient to use in quantity, being packaged in small quantities. Again, these foods are not a serious option for sleddog feeding.

DRY KIBBLED OR NUGGET DOG FOOD in paper sacks probably account for 90 percent or more of dog food sold to multiple dog owners. This is the common, familiar format everyone knows. This market can be divided roughly into two sectors, first the national brand names that are widely known and heavily advertised, and second the local brands or supermarket dog foods that vary from place to place and are rarely if ever advertised. Let's examine first the dry kibble or nugget format and then the two market sectors.

Dry nuggets, kibble and chunks represent the ultimate in user convenience for dog team owners, no question about that. They are easy to handle, easy to store, easy to feed. They are specifically prepared for convenience and user appeal. Manufacturers spend a lot of money to make certain that their dog food is appealing in appearance and smell, and convenient in use, knowing that these factors attract and keep a large market share for them. The average person doesn't know enough about canine nutrition to judge on any basis other than eye and nose appeal, and the dogs' appetite for the food, so there's a lot of concentration on maximising those factors.

There are, however, serious negative considerations concerning these feeding formats. Most of these foods are processed into their nugget form by 'extrusion', which involves the use of high heat levels. All ingredients must be mixed and cooked together for extrusion; this may not work well. Cereals, a major component of all dog foods, require a lot of cooking, but meat and vitamins suffer from the degree of cooking required by cereals. High heat alters or destroys many essential amino acids, enzymes, fatty acids and vitamins, resulting in lowered bio-availability of essential nutritional elements.
      Hard nuggets are difficult for dogs to eat.
If they try to gulp them down (the natural canine way of eating) they may choke. If they are forced to chew them, (not a natural way of eating for dogs) they experience heavy tartar buildup on their teeth from the accumulation of sticky food residues.
      Commercial dry extruded dog foods nearly always contain a wide variety of additives whose nutritional value to the dog is questionable. The cheaper brands often contain soybean meal to boost the protein analysis, but this kind of plant protein is nutritionally useless to dogs and may actually cause allergic or other toxic reactions. The majority contain beet pulp as a cheap filler and a "stool former"; beet pulp is of no proven nutritional value to dogs but absorbs up to seven times its weight in water volume, causing increased water needs and greatly increased stool volume. The plant saponins contained in beet pulp and soybean meal can be toxic to dogs. Other widely used feed additives include yucca plant fibre, wood cellulose, bentonite and similar nutritionally useless junk (justified as "dietary fibre" and "stool former" by manufacturers) included merely as filler or to ensure that the dogs produce "formed" stools despite the fact that they are excreting too much material that they cannot assimilate.

Commercial national brands of dry dog food are formulated first of all to make a healthy profit for the manufacturer, the distributor, and the retailer. They are manufactured for the most part by multinational corporations whose major responsibility is to their shareholders. A large part of the cost of producing these foods consists of the company's advertising budget! All of those full-page four-colour ads you see in glossy magazines must be paid for by the dog food you buy. The actual feed ingredients are often low-grade, low-cost items. These companies dominate the flow of information concerning canine nutrition, through their own 'research' departments and through grants to universities and veterinary schools. If their formulas appear to satisfy the 'known requirements' for canine nutrition, that just could be because they wrote the book themselves! These companies' actual concern for canine nutrition is open to question. Naive dog owners simply assume that the company has their dogs' best interests at heart and willingly pay high prices for cheap ingredients plus advertising plus three levels of profit.
      Working sleddog owners are often aware that these dry foods are not nutritionally adequate by themselves for their hard-working canines. Highly visible competitive dog drivers in publicised races such as the Iditarod Trail, the Yukon Quest, and the Fairbanks Open North American Championship are quite often 'sponsored' by national-brand dog food manufacturers, who provide them with free dog food and other subsidies. This can amount to a buy-off in some cases, as the driver is expected to recommend and push the product no matter what he actually thinks of it. Those well acquainted with highly competitive mushers are often aware that the sponsored musher may actually feed a diet consisting of less than twenty-five percent of the sponsor's product, making up the nutritional deficit with heavy meat and vitamin supplementation. It is pretty much an open secret in the upper levels of sleddog racing that nobody who feeds just the 'complete' dry ration can hope to keep his dogs in winning condition.

Local brands eliminate the high costs of national advertising campaigns, but may be questionable in nutritional content. They are better quality these days than they once were, by and large, but they, too, rely heavily on cheap ingredients and fillers like beet pulp. Supermarket brands frequently include soybean meal for a cheap boost to their protein analysis. Here and there in this market, bargains in reasonably good nutrition can be found, but across the board overall quality is often worse than the national brands.

DRY GROUND MEAL formulas are frequently marketed by smaller specialist companies. Some dry meal formulas specifically target high energy working dogs, including sleddogs. Since all the ingredients in the formula do not need to be cooked together, the available amino acid, fatty acid, enzyme and vitamin content may prove to be dramatically higher than those found in other formats. Meals are usually mixed with water just before feeding, yielding a soft mass that the dog can gulp down easily. The drawback to dry meals is that they are more difficult to feed, particularly in very cold climates, because the necessary high fat content for working dogs causes the meal to congeal into large blocks or lumps in freezing temperatures. Also these feeds do not store well for long periods of time; presented in a format of fine particles, they are highly exposed to oxidation and spoilage can occur rapidly, especially in warm weather. High preservative levels may be necessary to ensure that the feed keeps well enough for transportation and warehousing, which may not be the best thing for the ultimate consumer, the dog.
      Unfortunately there are relatively few such formulas (compared with the bewildering and highly-advertised variety of dry nugget foods) and they can turn out to be quite expensive. Seppala Kennels for about a year fed all its dogs on one such formulation manufactured in New York state by the Robert Abady Company and found it very satisfactory nutritionally, but difficult to handle in cold weather and extremely expensive in use.

More about feeding…
Next page